In this book, Michael Brown discusses a wide range of cases in which indigenous cultures and cultural artifacts are used or appropriated by majority (or foreign) cultures. The kinds of issues that he discusses include folk tales, folk music, native art, traditional ecological knowledge (including medicinals), crop varieties used primarily by Native peoples, and religious beliefs and objects that have been borrowed by others.



His strategy is to avoid establishing hard-and-fast rules but to explore, sympathetically, middle-ground solutions that respect Native beliefs and rights. He argues that general rules often cause more harm, introducing elements of policing and control that cause Native peoples to lose control over their own culture. According to Brown, negotiated solutions among well-meaning people can lead to better resolutions in individual cases, while also developing new principles that may prove to be useful in future disputes.



Brown explores these issues through a series of cases and anecdotes, which he seems to have chosen in a completely haphazard way. He tells the stories journalistically, providing his own commentary and the opinions of both sides of each issues. This approach makes the book very readable but not fully satisfactory to people looking for systematic treatment of these issues.



Hardliners will be offended because Brown does not give Natives exclusive control over their own heritage. He would argue that all culture includes shared (social) elements as well as individual elements (artistry for example), and that both features are routinely shared. Cultures borrow from one another all the time - - New Age beliefs borrow from Native religious, Native cultures have borrowed from Christianity and Islam. Exclusive rights ignore these elements of sharing, exchange, and new syntheses.



Brown is likely to satisfy most well-meaning people from majority cultures, such as liberal whites in the United States, Canada or Australia. Those people who regularly end up on the short end of the stick will be suspicious of consensus solutions, which reflect power imbalances in more subtle ways. This book awaits a response from them, but nonetheless represents a respectful attempt at reasonable solutions to these various problems.